University of British Columbia Sauder BCom Supplementary Application and Interview Guide
A strategic overview of the UBC Sauder supplementary application and interview process, explaining how applicants are assessed, what interviewers value, common question patterns, and how to prepare effectively.
University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business Supplementary Application and Interview Guide
The University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business attracts a large and diverse pool of applicants each year. While many students meet the academic requirements, only a portion are offered admission. This reflects a key reality of Sauder admissions: academic performance alone does not determine success. The UBC Sauder supplementary application (supp app) and interview components play a central role in final decisions.
UBC Sauder uses its supplementary assessment to understand how applicants communicate, reason through situations, collaborate with others, and align with Sauder’s values driven and experiential learning environment. Students who focus only on grades often underestimate how important it is to demonstrate these qualities clearly under time constraints.
This guide provides a complete overview of the UBC Sauder BCom supplementary application, including format, evaluation focus, common question themes, assessment approach, and preparation strategy.
UBC Sauder Supplementary Application Format
The UBC Sauder BCom supplementary application typically includes timed interview responses, which may involve video based answers and short written questions. While specific platforms or details may change, the overall structure remains stable.
Applicants are given limited time to prepare and respond, are usually allowed a single attempt per question, and cannot revise answers after submission. Responses are assessed based on clarity of thought, reasoning quality, communication effectiveness, and reflection, rather than presentation polish.
This structure favours applicants who can interpret prompts quickly, organize ideas efficiently, and communicate clearly under pressure. Preparation that mirrors real interview conditions and includes targeted feedback therefore produces stronger outcomes than passive review.
What UBC Sauder Looks for in Applicants
To perform well in the university supplementary application, applicants must understand how Sauder evaluates responses. Across all questions, a consistent set of competencies is assessed.
Communication and Clarity
Sauder places strong emphasis on clear and effective communication. Admissions reviewers assess how well applicants structure responses, explain reasoning, and convey ideas within time limits.
Responses that are overly complex or unfocused often lose impact. Strong responses are organized, concise, and easy to follow.
Leadership and Initiative
Leadership at Sauder is defined broadly. Interviewers look for evidence of initiative, responsibility, and influence, not formal titles.
Effective responses explain:
- Why the applicant took action
- How decisions were made
- What impact resulted
Collaboration and Team Awareness
Sauder values collaboration in both academic and experiential settings. Applicants are evaluated on their ability to work productively with others, manage disagreement, and contribute meaningfully to group outcomes.
Strong responses demonstrate respect for diverse perspectives and accountability within teams.
Reflection and Self Awareness
Reflection is a major differentiator in Sauder’s evaluation process. Admissions officers look for applicants who can learn from experience and articulate how those lessons influenced their development.
Responses that focus only on outcomes without reflection often appear shallow.
Ethical Judgment and Responsibility
Applicants may be presented with scenarios involving ethical or interpersonal challenges. Sauder evaluates how applicants recognize ethical considerations, weigh consequences, and respond responsibly.
The goal is to assess judgment and professionalism rather than moral certainty.
UBC Sauder Interview Question Examples
While exact questions change from cycle to cycle, the skills being assessed remain consistent.
Motivation and Program Fit Questions
Admissions reviewers assess whether applicants demonstrate genuine interest in business, understanding of Sauder’s experiential and values based approach, and intentional program choice.
Strong responses connect personal experiences to learning, impact, and growth, rather than rankings or career outcomes.
Leadership and Team Scenarios
Applicants may be asked to describe group challenges or leadership experiences. Interviewers focus on decision making process, communication approach, and reflection, not authority or success alone.
Ethical and Situational Judgment Questions
Evaluation centers on structured reasoning, stakeholder awareness, and professionalism.
High quality responses clearly identify the issue, consider perspectives, propose a balanced response, and reflect on responsibility.
Communicating Under Time Pressure
UBC Sauder consistently rewards responses that are focused, logically structured, and clearly delivered, even when time is limited. Clarity outweighs complexity.
How to Answer UBC Sauder Interview Questions Effectively
Strong responses follow a clear and intentional structure. Applicants briefly set context, explain their reasoning, describe actions taken, and reflect on outcomes.
Sauder places greater value on learning and reflection than on achievement alone. Applicants who demonstrate adaptability and self awareness perform more strongly.
Effective time management is essential. High performing applicants outline structure early, pace responses carefully, and conclude clearly. Practicing under timed conditions with actionable feedback is one of the most effective ways to improve.
Common Mistakes That Weaken UBC Sauder Applications
Many applicants underperform due to preventable issues, including:
- Providing generic leadership examples
- Over rehearsed responses
- Limited reflection
- Poor organization
- Ineffective time management
These issues are best addressed through active practice using realistic interview prompts and objective feedback.
How to Prepare for the UBC Sauder Supplementary Interview
Effective interview preparation emphasizes performance and clarity, not memorization. High impact preparation includes timed practice, structured speaking, and targeted feedback.
Reading sample answers without applying them rarely leads to improvement. Sauder interviews reward adaptability, reasoning, and communication, which must be trained through realistic interview simulation.
Preparation Timeline and Final Checklist
Four to six weeks before
Review evaluation criteria and practice core question categories.
Two to three weeks before
Shift toward full interview simulations and strengthening reflection quality.
Final week
Complete technical preparation and light review while avoiding last minute memorization.
Final Perspective on Preparing for UBC Sauder
UBC Sauder interviews are designed to identify applicants who can think clearly, communicate effectively, collaborate with others, and reflect thoughtfully in a business learning environment.
Applicants who prepare strategically using past questions, actionable feedback, detailed performance reports, and program relevance evaluation through Myls Interview gain a meaningful advantage in a highly competitive admissions process.
How Myls Interview Helps Improve UBC Sauder Interview Outcomes

Strong performance in the UBC Sauder supplementary interview requires applicants to demonstrate clear reasoning, effective communication, leadership awareness, and program alignment under pressure.
Myls Interview supports this preparation by offering:
- University admissions video interview simulation reflecting real Sauder style interviews
- Practice with past interview questions based on UBC Sauder patterns
- Customizable interview questions targeting specific competencies
- Full response recording for reviewing delivery and clarity
- Performance reports with scoring across structure, reasoning, communication, and program relevance
- Program relevance evaluation measuring alignment with Sauder expectations
- Actionable feedback on every attempt
- Progress tracking across multiple practice sessions
By combining realistic practice, structured feedback, and program specific evaluation, Myls Interview helps applicants improve performance and increase their likelihood of receiving an offer.